Jilly @ Poetry Hut brought up an important conversation the other day:
So what’s the deal? Why do the mainstream media hardly ever do articles or reviews about women poets? It is often hard to find ANY article to link to.
Are there more men poets than women poets? (When I got my MFA, the poetry students were mostly women.) Are men poets simply better poets than women poets? More interesting? Better at self-promotion maybe? Do articles in which the subject has a penis make for increased sales or something? Are men poets more likely to get published by a large press? What? Is? The? Deal? Here?
and again today.
My response:
As someone who used to work for the MSM, I must say that in some ways, yes, they are responsible for our lack of information. But at the same time, a lot of reporters (I’m talking about your average newspaper reporter here, not the books editor, which we all know is a dying position) just don’t always have the time to go & seek out the news and profile stories. (They’re put on breaking news and PR releases instead.) Often are not in the know about who they SHOULD be covering. The best thing we can do as people in the poetry/writing community is to send word about local poets (especially women!) who win prizes/have interesting lives/work with local organizations/publish books/run local presses, etc. to the media and tell them we’d like to see them written about. So much of what goes into the news comes from tips from readers. I hope this adds some perspective to the debate. However, I do agree that there is an overall lack of women in the media (as makers of media and subjects in media), and that this is a problem.
Seriously, the only way I would go back to being a staff writer for a newspaper again is if I could cover books, authors, artists, films, and/or musicians ONLY. Every once in a while, I got to squeeze in a cool Q&A with a local poet, or an art review of a big gallery show (that the other arts reporters were not already covering.) But most of the time it was what church has had another fire and where should we direct traffic for NASCAR week and what new homeowners association was popping up, etc., etc. The true reason I left my job was not just the crappy pay, but the realization that it would take another 30 years of crappy reporting to ever get to cover what I really wanted to do full-time. This is why freelancing is so much better – if you can balance it with your other work life. But then again, I think I have put myself in a corner as far as that goes, too. Maybe when I move I will tackle the magazine article ideas floating in my head and stop settling for the absolute least amount of creative energy (although it is informative) for my pay.